CONNECT WITH US
USU Counseling Center 19th Annual Conference
"Supershrinks: Learning from the Field's Most Effective Practitioners "
with Scott D. Miller, Ph.D." Friday, April 12, 2013
Evaluation of Conference by attendees
85% of attendees completed evaluation forms (93 out of 109)
Professions of attendees:
| 0% |
Certified Counselor |
43% |
Psychologist |
10% |
Marriage & Family Therapist |
15% |
Social Worker |
10% |
Professional Counselor |
14% |
Student |
1% |
Psychiatrist |
6% |
Other |
Evaluation of Presenter:
| Overall rating of presenter | 2% | Did not respond | |
| 85% | Outstanding | 0% | Below average |
| 13% | Better than average | 0% | Poor |
| Knowledge of subject matter/expertise | 2% | Did not respond | |
| 96% | Very well informed | 0% | Not well informed |
| 2% | Adequately informed | 0% | Very poorly informed |
| Attitude toward subject | 0% | Did not respond | |
| 97% | Enthusiastic | 1% | Routine interest |
| 2% | Rather interested | 0% | Disinterested |
| Attitude toward participants | 1% | Did not respond | |
| 81% | Very helpful and understanding | 1% | Routine, neutral |
| 16% | Interested | 1% | Distant, cold, aloof |
| Clarity | 1% | Did not respond | |
| 61% | Extremely clear | 0% | Unclear |
| 38% | Clear | 0% | Confusing |
| Organization | 3% | Did not respond | |
| 82% | Very organized/efficient | 0% | Somewhat disjointed |
| 15% | Adequately organized | 0% | Jumbled and muddled |
Evaluation of presentation content and form
| Objective one:Describe four specific practices employed by highly effective therapists | |||||
| 49% | Strongly Agree | 40% | Agree | 6% | Undecided |
| 0% | Disagree | 0% | Strongly Disagree | 5% | No Response |
| Objective two: Describe a method for determining the overall success rate of their clinical work. | |||||
| 65% | Strongly Agree | 31% | Agree | 1% | Undecided |
| 0% | Disagree | 1% | Strongly Disagree | 2% | No Response |
| Objective three: Describe a method for identifying cases at risk for dropping out of treatment or experiencing a negative or null outcome. | |||||
| 42% | Strongly Agree | 38% | Agree | 16% | Undecided |
| 0% | Disagree | 1% | Strongly Disagree | 3% | No Response |
| Objective four: Describe a method for identifying and improving areas of weakness in their clinical work. | |||||
| 62% | Strongly Agree | 31% | Agree | 2% | Undecided |
| 1% | Disagree | 1% | Strongly Disagree | 3% | No Response |
| The scope and coverage of this presentation was appropriate for me. | |||||
| 61% | Strongly Agree | 27% | Agree | 6% | Undecided |
| 1% | Disagree | 1% | Strongly Disagree | 4% | No Response |
| The workshop provided specific guidance and ideas which I can apply in my job responsibilities. | |||||
| 69% | Strongly Agree | 20% | Agree | 5% | Undecided |
| 2% | Disagree | 1% | Strongly Disagree | 3% | No Response |
| The value I derived from this presentation was well worth the time required of me to participate. | |||||
| 74% | Strongly Agree | 17% | Agree | 4% | Undecided |
| 1% | Disagree | 1% | Strongly Disagree | 3% | No Response |