|
|
RESEARCH: COCONUT COIR
STUDIES |
|
|
-
A Comparison of Coconut Coir and
Sphagnum Peat as Soil-less Media Components for Plant Growth Jason Holman, B. Bugbee, and J. Chard - 2005
|
INTRODUCTION Coconut coir, a by-product of the coconut industry, has
been promoted as an alternative to peat moss in soil-less media.
Sphagnum peat moss has long been a standard component of soil-less
media, but some people have expressed concern that it is a
non-renewable resource. Although it does not appear that world peat
resources will be in short supply for a very long time (see
www.peatmoss.com), coconut coir may have characteristics that make it
a useful component of soil-less media mixes. Coir has been considered
to promote excellent plant growth but there are few rigorous studies
that have compared it with peat moss control plants. However, ten
years ago, Meerow (1994) found that growth of Ixora coccine was
significantly reduced compared to growth in a sphagnum peat moss
control. Vavrina (1996) found that there were no adverse effects of
coir to tomato and pepper transplants, but a subsequent study in the
same lab (Arenas et al., 2002) found that media with more than 50%
coir had reduced growth compared to peat-grown control plants. They
suggested that a high N immobilization by microorganisms and a high
C:N ratio in the coir may have caused the reduced growth.
Lopez-Galarza (2002) found that root development of strawberry plants
grown in peat moss was better than in coir in some, but not all,
studies. Handreck and Black (2002), in a comprehensive textbook on
soil-less media, review the chemical and physical properties of coir
dust that are being sold in Australia. They indicate that since all
coir products have extremely high K contents and low Calcium contents,
it is critical to add a source of Ca to improve plant calcium uptake.
Since the pH is already close to 6, liming materials cannot be used
because they would increase the pH above optimum. Handreck and Black
says that “Therefore, all coir-based media must be amended with
gypsum, which also overcomes their low sulfur status.” Ma and Nichols
(2004) recently reported that the problems with coir extend beyond its
high salinity. Their data indicate that high concentrations of
phenolic compounds in fresh coir are at least partly responsible for
the growth reductions observed in other studies. Several studies at
the USU Crop Physiology Laboratory indicated that monocots grown in
coconut coir were extremely chlorotic and stunted. The objective of
this study was to see if there are differences among plant species and
types of coconut coir compared to growth in sphagnum peat moss. |
|