| AGENDA PACKET |
||
| 3:00 | Call to order         Approval of Minutes - September 7, 2004 |
Janis Boettinger |
| Announcements          Banner Training Available         How to Register for Banner | Janis Boettinger | |
| 3:05 | Information Items         EPC Curriculum Deadline - December 16         Faculty Involvement in Evaluating Journal         Subscriptions - Subject Librarians         Syllabus Resources           Proposal for Domestic Partner Benefits            December Commencement         ASUSU Update |
Janis Boettinger Betty Rozum Janis Boettinger Janis Boettinger Janis Boettinger Les Essig |
| Consent Agenda         Library Advisory Council         Honors Program                    Faculty Evaluation Committee Report |
|
|
| 3:35 | Key Issues & Action Items         Athletic Council                 Betty Dance                 Kathy Piercy        Calendar Committe                 Academic Calendar - 2005-2006                 Proposed Holiday Calendar - 2006-2007       |
|
| 3:40 | University Business         Budget Presentation - Q&A |
Administration |
| 4:20 | New Business        Faculty Forum, November 1        Graduate Student Forum - Volunteers |
|
| 4:30 | Adjourn | |
| Faculty Senate Meeting Minutes for September
7, 2004 Call to Order Minutes Information Items University Business There will be an office opening in the Wells Fargo Building in Salt Lake City. Thanks to Jonathan Bullen and Dell Loy Hansen, two USU graduates. This office will house the new Vice President for University Advancement, Scott Mietchen. There will also be space for Alumni and apparel and memorabilia. Salt Lake will see a presence that they haven’t seen before. The office will open October 1, 2004. Vice President Mietchen will start November 1, 2004. Randy Spetman is the new Athletic Director. Randy comes from Airforce Academy where he served as the Athletic Director. President Hall suggested inviting Randy to an Executive Committee and maybe even the Faculty Senate. Provost Albrecht commented that these two new appointees, Scott Mietchen and Randy Spetman, understand that Utah State academics really do come first. The search for a new Vice President for Information
and Technology is underway. This position will no longer hold the title
of Chief Information Officer. There will be Chief Information Officer
position, but will be a subordinate to the Vice President for Information
Technology. There will also be a VP for Information Technology Security.
Barbara White accepted an Associate Provost position at University of
Georgia. Ron Godfrey is chairing this search. President Hall is starting to meet with legislators. There was a group of Regents here last week; they talked about Utah State’s capital facilities requests: 1) Peterson Agriculture Building and 2) moving Agriculture facilities from the north to the south to the Caine Dairy area. A presentation was made to the regents and will also be made to the State of Utah Building Board. Provost Albrecht introduced Gary Straquadine, Associate Vice Provost. Gary will be heavily involved with Deans and Department Heads with the transition of Logan Campus academic activities from Continuing Education to the Provost’s Office. President Hall is pleased with the preparedness and quality of incoming class. We have done a great job in recruiting the best class in history of Utah State. Information Items School of Graduate Studies Enrollment and Curriculum Management Joyce introduced Gary Straquadine, Associate Vice Provost. Gary has been charged with managing curriculum and to oversee Evening and Summer School transition from Continuing Education to the Provost’s office. Gary has been at USU for 16 years. He was formerly the ASTE department head for 8 years. Evening School began in 1981 for non-traditional students, but found that 66% were traditional students. Summer school in the past has been taught in three different models (part of load, SWC, ES). The goal of the Provost’s office is to develop a plan to enhance the curriculum by eliminating bottleneck courses, general education process, graduation rate process, new program possibilities. The Provost’s office will work directly with Department Heads instead of individual faculty members for requests. There will be a proposal request process based on “guiding principles”. Consent Agenda Key Issues and Action Items New Business Athletic Council Students Adjourn |
Utah State UniversityLibrary
Subject Librarians 2005
Name Phone# Departments Kevin Brewer x0737 Computer Science Mathematics & Statistics Ann Buttars x2661 Americana, Intermountain West, Local history, Mormonism Betty Dance x2681 HPER, Instructional Technology, Secondary Education Jennifer Duncan x8148 History – World (not Eastern Europe) John Elsweiler x2636 Aerospace Studies, Communicative Disorders, Military Science Britt Fagerheim x2643 Business Information Systems , Economics, Journalism
& Communication Judy Johnson x3331 Environment & Society, Geology, Landscape Architecture
& Environmental Planning Cynthia Nordgren x2679 English (Commonwealth) Literature Vicki Read x2914 English (American) Literature Betty Rozum x2632 Nursing Kathy Schockmel x2749 Art (6020) Flora Shrode x8033 Biology (8030) John Walters x2683 History (US) (6050) Sandra Weingart x0739 Agricultural Systems Technology & Education
(1020) Steve Weiss x3661 Aquatic, Watershed, and Earth Resources (7040) Deleyne Wentz x1479 Elementary Education (3030) All Selectors Library Science (9055) |
| Library
Advisory Council
FY 03/04 Annual Report
Members: Overview: 2003/04
Action Items: 2. Librarians visited most departments on campus and made a presentation on the cost of journals and discussed the journal cut list for the 2004-05 year. 3. Kent Clark requested input on how best to approach University faculty in regards to donating to the Library Faculty Endowment through payroll deduction. 4. A report was presented to the Council on a survey conducted of University faculty to gauge the feasibility and interest in having an on campus document delivery program. The result of the survey showed that there is not sufficient interest to institute the service at this time. 2004/05
Agenda Items: 2. Fund-raising and the library's capital campaign 3. Promoting library services and awareness of the new building 4. Ongoing discussion regarding scholarly communications and journal acquisitions 5. Faculty and librarian collaboration and engagement in the curriculum |
| UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY
HONORS PROGRAM ANNUAL REPORT
2003-2004 Academic Year PURPOSE: The Honors Program provides students with an enhanced track for their lower- and upper-division course requirements. Students and faculty work together in intensive seminars, experimental classes, interdisciplinary courses, writing projects, and special activities. Members of the program earn Honors credit on their transcripts and pursue one of three different Honors degrees. PERSONNEL: David F. Lancy, Professor of Anthropology, Director; Christie Fox, Ph.D., Program Coordinator; Kay Gamble, Executive Assistant II, Secretary, Katherine Shakespeare, Peer Advisor HONORS FELLOWS: Kay to list along w/ their assignments Overview: The Honors Program at Utah State has enjoyed more drastic change in the last three years than in the preceding 32 years of its history. The most significant changes have all been triggered by change in the Provost’s Office and concomitant changes in recruiting and retention policies. In the past, Honors was seen as potentially driving away the students “High School/College Relations” was trying to recruit to USU. Now, the “Honors Pathway” http://www.usu.edu/honors/pathway/index.htm is treated as the primary incentive for high ability students to matriculate at USU. As a consequence of this new emphasis in recruiting coupled with changes in Honors itself, our Honors student body is better educated than ever before (cutoff=124 index), more committed to Honors and more interested in “stretching” themselves academically through undergraduate research, for example. All “Presidential” scholars are now automatically enrolled in Honors 2000, the online Orientation to Honors and undergraduate research designed and managed by the Honors Program and taught by Vice Provost Kinkead. This Fall marks the 3rd iteration of that course and we’re seeing the enrollment climb (270=F ’03; 350=F ’04) along with the level of commitment and enthusiasm of the students (as reflected in a dramatic increase in postings to the online forum, for example). Many will have also been enrolled in dedicated Honors sections of Connections. This was the second year for this new initiative and the first year in which we jettisoned about 90% (next year we’ll replace the remaining 10%) of the old Connections curriculum replacing it with one of our own devising. It was also the first year for a new cadre of Honors Connections Instructors who’ve worked together as a team for six months to revamp the course. Initial assessment results are extremely positive. Motivated by the desire to retain students who were falling in the crack between first year Honors courses and Departmental Honors, we developed a new course in 2003, HONR 2100 Inquiry. Six sections were offered corresponding roughly to clusters of interest (e.g. applied biology, social science, engineering, etc) taught by very distinguished faculty. The one credit class met weekly during Winter semester and focused on integrating students into their major, preparing for departmental honors, identifying a research mentor and line of research and pre-planning for grad school. In short, the class is designed to help students construct a road map for the rest of their travel on the “Honors Pathway” right on to grad school. One measure of the success of these endeavors was that we had 6 candidates for the Goldwater Scholarship last year with 2 winners and the previous high had been 2/1. Personnel changes have been equally dramatic. The retirement of our Assistant Director Robyn Daines, triggered a wholesale reanalysis of role assignments. 90% of the Assistant Director’s responsibilities were shifted to Kay Gamble, who was promoted to Executive II. The Assistant Director position was renamed Program Coordinator with new responsibilities for communications, marketing, Prestige Fellowships and teaching. We were extremely fortunate to hire Christie Fox, holder of a Ph.D. from Indiana with extensive experience with Honors, recruiting and a rich teaching record. She is now managing the ENGL 2010 H class and teaching one of the two sections offered each semester (previously we’d offered 1/semester). She’s also teaching of the sections of Honors Connections. She’s very active in advising students—especially with respect to applicants for national scholarships such as the Truman and Goldwater. Katherine Shakespeare “graduated” from a position of (Teaching) Fellow to Peer Advisor and has helped shoulder what has become a much greater responsibility to field queries re the Program and assist students in planning their Honors course of study. All of us are also much more involved than in the past with new recruiting initiatives such as Preview Day and Scholar’s Day as well as SOAR. Mary Heers is a much-decorated, recently retired teacher from Preston High School who has also joined the Honors team during the past year. Mary developed and now teaches a repeatable .5 credit “Enrichment” class HONOR 2200. She’s teaching a section of Honors Connections and a section of ENGL 2010H each semester. The Honors website got both a visual and structural makeover during the past year. Its coverage of Honors at every level from the broadly philosophical (Why do Honors?) to minutiae has been greatly expanded. The website is managed by Dr. Fox while Katherine Shakespeare edits the new, thrice-yearly Honors Newsletter. Other significant developments during the past year include the establishment of an award for the most promising Honors student. Named in honors of Helen Cannon, the endowment was established by her family and friends. New Departmental Honors Programs have been completed or are under discussion for the Colleges of Business, Engineering and Natural Resources and the Departments of Social Work, ASTE, Art and Elementary Education. We are moving away from a “one size fits all” model to a more tailor-made approach. We’ve also launched a new Honors Program in Creative Writing that brings together course offerings from several disciplines. The challenges facing Honors are all of the “be careful what you wish for” variety. We are “bursting at the seams,” quite literally. Our physical facilities are now uncomfortably crowded much of the time and we are hard pressed to respond quickly to student visitors and queries. Our Honors breadth classes have all been re-capped at higher levels to accommodate enrollment growth. So our vaunted “smaller” Honors classes have gotten pretty large. We’ve added 4 new courses to the Honors curriculum, and increased the number of sections of existing courses, totaling 15 additional course sections in three years. We’ve added additional staff, including doubling the number of Honors Teaching Fellows—all without a budget increase. Not only are we unable to expand in our present location, we have been unable to find a new home for Honors once the old Merrill Library is demolished. To conclude, we have reached a point where Honors can legitimately claim to partner with all departments on campus in the recruitment, retention and optimization of their best and brightest majors. In return, the Program will need the political support of the campus at large to insure that we have adequate financial and physical resources to continue this service to the university. HIGHLIGHTS: Kay & Katherine to search for these kudos 34 Honors students graduated with Honors degrees; 58 filed Department Honors Plans of Study; and Honors students received Honors Program scholarships; Chad Wasden and Jeffry Gittins received Honors scholarships. Honors student received the following recognition: Honors instructors and Department Honors Advisors
received the following recognition: CONTENTS OF ANNUAL REPORT: I.
CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES, 2002-2003
A. Students in the Honors Program
B. Honors Graduates C. Honors Courses E. Faculty Participating in Honors While the decanal evaluation was very positive, the overarching recommendation was that the Honors Program become much more central in decision-making regarding the university’s evolving plan for recruiting and retaining exceptionally able students. And this has, in fact, happened. Shortly after the external report was submitted, the Director began work on a new course, HONR 2000 or Beehive Scholars. This course was designed to implement an initiative undertaken the previous year by Vice Provost Kinkead, namely, ‘cream of the crop’ (to capitalize on Pres. Hall’s milking odyssey). The problem to be addressed was that, after lavishing a great deal of attention on prospective students, once they were admitted to USU they were, effectively, ignored with predictably negative retention results. Honors proposed that all students of recognized ability should be routed to a new 1 semester online (to avoid schedule conflicts) class which would integrate students better into the university and forecast for them the opportunities and expectations that lay ahead. It included instructional modules on choosing a major, appropriate avenues of employment, scholarship and fellowship opportunities, U.R.C.O. and other undergraduate research programs, as examples. Through the course and through face-to-face meetings with Dr. Kinkead (the instructor of record), students were encouraged to air their views and seek counsel in planning their course of study. The initiative was judged a success, the only drawback being that the ‘catch’ was poor as less than a third of the target group made it into the class. HONR 2000 was revised and renamed (Scholar’s Forum) during the summer ’03 and we’ll be reporting on the ’03 experience next Fall. The Director, David F. Lancy was granted sabbatical leave for ’02-’03 and used a significant part of the leave to study Honors Programs, nationally. Lancy spent extended periods with Honors and First Year Experience(FYE) personnel at UC Davis, Arizona State, Clemson, and the Universities of South Carolina and Maryland. Many ideas gathered from these visits will be trialed at Utah State but Lancy’s strongest conclusion was that USU’s student population is so different from the norm elsewhere that home-grown solutions will be necessary. During his absence, Prof Tom Peterson filled in as interim
Director. There were 2 primary innovations during Peterson’s term.
A new .5 credit repeatable ‘Enrichment’ class, HONR 2200
was developed and approved to encourage students to take advantage of
cultural and intellectual offerings on campus. Second, for the first
time, scholarship awardees were pre-registered for Fall classes in April.
This included the aforementioned HONR 2000 class as well as an Honors’
breadth class, together constituting a ‘taste of Honors.’
While the pre-registration was not without problems, the ‘catch’
went up considerably, such that, approximately 85% of the target audience
actually enrolled in HONR 2000 this Fall. Again the results of these
efforts have been very positive and this will be reported on more fully
next year. Enrollment
Statistics
2002-2003 Honors Advisory Board |
|
Faculty Evaluation Committee
Report to Faculty Senate September 2004 Craig Petersen, Director of Analysis, Assessment, and Accreditation, met with the committee to discuss the faculty evaluation system students are currently using at Utah State and how results are reported. The practice of publishing faculty evaluation scores on the university website was discussed. Craig indicated that currently faculty evaluation data are accessible by entering “About USU” and then going to an instructor’s home department. The results of the faculty evaluation are reported using the mean score from the first two questions of the evaluation. Each instructor’s average is posted as well as the department, college, and university averages. Results are available for the past four semesters and will continue to be updated each semester. The committee discussed having students complete the faculty evaluations on-line. Craig Petersen had his students complete the faculty evaluations on-line for both his on-campus and off-campus course. He created a link to the faculty evaluation form using the quiz module in WebCT. Completing the course evaluation was the last class assignment. Students were given points (10) in the on-campus course for completing the evaluation while the off-campus course was given bonus points. The response rate for 500 students in the on-campus course was approximately 95%; for the off-campus course it was 100%. Craig believed that the comments obtained on-line were more insightful than those normally produced in class because students had time to think about their responses. Students’ responses are still confidential because WebCT credits the students for completing the evaluation, but does not allow the instructor to see which students wrote what comments. In comparison to conducting the evaluations in class, Craig noted that the response rate was higher for the on-line method than when evaluations are distributed in-class. He believes that in class evaluation return rate is approximately 75%. Reasons for the lower in-class return rate might be students hurrying to their next class, students being absent the day of evaluations, or students’ apathy concerning filling out evaluations. The following pros
and cons for using on-line evaluations were discussed. Cons: Questions and issues under consideration by the committee: 1. Should evaluation
results be posted on the University Website? Vince Lafferty submitted an evaluation instrument which he would the committee to review. The evaluation would include the current faculty evaluation information but would also include factors which are unique to distance education. During April the committee review many exceptional candidates for the Robins Awards. The committee recommended Dr. Lyle G. McNeal from Animal, Dairy and Veterinary Science for Faculty Advisor of the Year and Dr. John Seiter from Communication, Speech, Language and Philosophy for Teacher of the Year. |