Faculty Senate Executive Committee
Champ Hall Conference
Room
19 September 2005
3:00 - 4:30 p.m.
AGENDA
3:00 Call to Order
Approval
of Minutes from 15 August 2005
Announcements
Wellness at USU—Lindsey Lovell
3:10 University Business
3:20 Information Items for Consent Agenda
EPC Business—Joyce Kinkead
Faculty Evaluations
Committee—Mike Lyons
Libraries Advisory
Council—Lisa Berreau
ASUSU—Spencer Watts
Graduate Council—Larry
Smith
3:40 Key Issues and Action Items
Resolution
supporting inauguration—Derek Mason
Faculty
Senate Curriculum Task Force —Derek Mason
Senate’s
input on Provost Search—Derek Mason
4:20 New Business
Reports on caucus meetings
4:30 Adjournment
Minutes
Faculty Senate
Executive Committee Minutes
15 August 2005
Present: Stan Albrecht, Paul Barr (for Gary Merkley), Stephen Bialkowski, Lynn Dudley, John Kras, Pat Lambert, Derek Mason, Brent Miller, Rob Morrison, Shawn Olsen, David Paper (for David Luthy)
Excused: Noelle Cockett, Bruce Miller, Doug Ramsey
Presenters: Shelley Lindauer, Scott Meitchen, Renee Payne, Linda Wolcott
Guests: Terry Hodges
Derek Mason called the meeting to order at 3:05 pm.
Stephen Bialkowski moved to accept the 17 April 2005 minutes as written. The motion seconded by John Kras, passed unanimously.
Announcements
Review of FSEC: FSEC prepares the agenda for the Senate meeting, proposes standing and special committees to the Senate, examines work of Senate committees, works as a steering committee and liaison, and puts together faculty senate handbook. Executive members are caucus leaders, and hold caucus with all senators once per semester.
Brown Bag Lunches with President Albrecht are scheduled September 14, October 21, November 10, and December 5.
University
Business
Stan Albrecht presented University Business.
Legislative Agenda: Compensation was key. Last year 2.5% from state funds and 1.5% from tier two and we would like to see this again. State revenue looks good and USU will hopefully get around 3% (estimate) increase this year with the main focus on salary increases and less attention on health benefits side of compensation package.
Retention: USU was given $2.25 million from the legislator for faculty and staff retention. Provost has gone through a comprehensive process to review with the deans and department heads the allocation model. The $360 thousand will be allocated January 1st and $60 thousand will be held back for special cases over the course of the next academic year. USU is using funds to position itself with strong faculty who are comfortable and will stay off the job market, thus working from the front end.
Non-Resident Tuition Waiver: Impacts of House Bill 331 drastically
affected USU. USU’s primary out-of-state
markets are Eastern Idaho and
Ag Relocation: Need to get second half of funding for the $9.5 million project to move North Campus to South Farm. Last year USU received $5 million. This relocation will allow USU to expand Innovation Campus from 30 acres to 150 acres. This is a major challenge. The recent legislator visit allowed USU to find out that the legislators did not realize this was a $10 million project, but a $5 million project and was finished last year. However, by the end of the two day session, legislators were saying “we had no idea how good you are” and “you really are a great research institution, we had no clue”. In this sense the legislature visit was a success. Now we can go back and ask them to help us take the next step.
USTAR: Mentioned
the USTAR Initiative and have received some initial funding.
Fuel and Power:
On the agenda again. This
legislature will not address two major problems which USU and other
institutions in the state of
Series of System Requirements: USU is involved in a series of System
Requests including the Engineering Initiative (in its 5th
year). The new initiatives are a Student
Success Initiative will focus on Access, advising, retention, and diversity. Diversity is critically important. The increase in high school graduates will
come primarily from the Latino population.
And college attendance rate is much, much lower than it is for other
groups. The second part of this is
Financial Aid. The state of
Capital Development Project: Will continue to be the classroom replacement
building that will replace the Merrill Library.
The Merrill Library will go down next spring. This will be a multi-purpose high tech
classroom building and replace some of the functions of the Peterson Ag
Building and will also respond to some needs from the
Recital Hall Grand Opening in January.
Library-Coming along
Living Learning Center-little behind schedule
Romney Stadium South Entrance and Restrooms and Concessions
Overall Most Difficult Challenge: Stabilize enrollment and revenue.
Information Items
for Consent Agenda
EPC Business &
Annual Report
Prepared by Joyce Kinkead. Shawn Olsen moved that the EPC Business be placed on the consent agenda. The motion seconded by Stephen Bialkowski, passed unanimous.
Shelley Lindauer presented the
Shawn Olsen moved that the
Key Issues and Action Items
Library Update
Presented by Linda Wolcott.
The new name of the Library is Merrill-Cazier Library. The move of the library started
Capital Development
Campaign
Scott Meitchen presented the development plan. This is the first comprehensive campaign. The campaign will be based on “transformation”. The public announcement of the campaign is scheduled for Fall 2007. Working goal is between $200 and $300 million, but this is not official yet. Started counting money July 1, 2003 and normal campaigns are seven years. 2003 to 2007 are the quite years of the campaign, and will have earned more than 50% of the goal. December 31, 2010 is the campaign conclusion.
Human Resources
Renee Payne presented the Benefits Plan Model with a Benefits Advisory Board that will meet year round. She requested support of the Benefits Advisory Board and requested faculty representation on the Benefits Advisory Board. Stephen Bialkowski noted that this kind of action on benefits has been lacking in the past and would suggest 2 members from BFW (i.e. the chair and vice-chair) as faculty representatives. Derek Mason had previously asked Stephen Bialkowski and Jeanette Norton to attend the Advisory Board meetings during the summer. John Kras moved to have Human Resources as a Key Issue on the agenda. The motion seconded by Robert Morrison, passed unanimously.
Academic Rights &
Responsibilities Committee
Lynn Dudley presented the ARRC update. Stephen Bialkowski moved to have Academic Right & Responsibilities as a Key Issue on the agenda. The motion seconded by John Kras, passed unanimously.
New Business
Representation to the
Benefits Advisory Board
Lynn Dudley moved to place support for Representation to the Employee Benefits Advisory Board to be presented by Stephen Bialkowski and Jeanette Norton to be placed as an Action Item on the agenda. The motion seconded by John Kras, passed unanimously.
Caucus with College
Representatives
John Kras moved to place a Caucus with College Representatives as New Business on the Agenda. The motion seconded by Stephen Bialkowski, passed unanimously.
The meeting was adjourned at 4:35pm.
EPC Business
Introduction:
Educational Policies Committee
Report for Faculty Senate 10/3/05
Joyce Kinkead-Chair, Stanley Allen-Agriculture, Scot Allgood-Education and
Human Services, Todd Crowl-Natural Resources, Richard Cutler-Science, Jennifer
Duncan-Libraries, Quinn Millet, ASUSU President, Spencer Watts, ASUSU Academic
VP, Kathy Fitzgerald-HASS, David Luthy-DEED chair, Ronda Menlove-Extension,
David Olsen-Business, Jason Pickup-GSS President, Jeff Walters-ASC Chair,
Darwin Sorensen-Engineering
Meeting Dates:
September 1, 2005, October 6, 2005, November 3, 2005, December 1, 2005, January
5, 2006, February 2, 2006, March 2, 2006, April 6, 2006—all at 3:00 p.m. in
Champ Hall, following Curriculum Subcommittee, which commences at 2:00 p.m.
Curriculum Subcommittee
In August meetings, the Curriculum Subcommittee approved the following
proposals pending approval from the Budget and Faculty Welfare Committee:
Action Items
A proposal
for a Major in International Business within the Department of Business
Administration.
A proposal
to offer an Agricultural Communication and Journalism Major in the Agricultural
Systems Technology and Education Department leading to a Bachelor of Science
degree.
Information Items
Cindy
Moulton submitted the EPC deadlines for 2006-2007 (See below)
|
Semester |
Submission Date |
Curriculum Sub-committee Date |
|
Summer 2006 |
November 14, 2005 |
December 1, 2005 |
|
Fall 2006 |
December 12, 2005 |
January 12, 2006 |
|
Spring 2007 |
March 23, 2006 |
April 6, 2006 |
|
Summer 2007 |
November 13, 2006 |
December 7, 2006 |
|
Fall 2007 |
December 11, 2006 |
January 11, 2007 |
John
Mortensen distributed an updated list of inactive courses listed in the General
Catalog. Departments need to complete
the course approval from for courses they wish to delete and/or
inactivate.
Recommendations
EPC recommends approval of above changes by Faculty Senate.
Faculty Evaluations Committee
Report to the U.S.U. Faculty Senate Executive
Committee
Faculty Senate Faculty
Evaluation Committee
September 12, 2005
Committee Membership
Michael Lyons, Chair
Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences
Marilyn Albertson (08) Extension
Noel Carmack (06) Libraries
Lindsey Christensen (06) ASUSU Business Senator
Lincoln Essig (06) ASUSU Engineering Senator
Jamison Fargo (06) Education and Human Services
Chuck Hawkins (07) Natural Resources
Rhonda Miller (07) Agriculture
David Olsen (07) Business
Jason Pickup (06) GSS President
Greg Podgorski (08) Science
Gary Stewardson (06) Engineering
Committee Responsibilities
The
Faculty Evaluation Committee shall: 1)
assess methods for evaluating faculty performance; 2) recommend improvements in
methods of evaluation; 3) recommend methods of faculty development; and; 4)
decide university awards for Professor and Advisor of the Year.
Issues before the Committee, 2005-2006
Over
the past few years, a number of U.S.U. Faculty Senate members have expressed
concerns about the U.S.U. teaching evaluation process. In the months ahead, the Committee will
assess this evaluation process, and it may recommend changes in the process to
the U.S.U. Faculty Senate. One change
the committee will consider will be the revision and/or simplification the
existing evaluation form. The committee
will initiate this process by surveying the faculty to guage faculty
satisfaction with the existing form, and to solicit recommendations from the
faculty about how the form might be improved.
The committee will also consider replacing in-class hard copy
evaluations with on line evaluations, and the survey will include a question
addressing this issue. A draft of the
survey follows.
U.S.U.
Faculty Senate Faculty Evaluation Committee
Faculty
Survey
1. How many
years of university teaching experience to you have?
A. Five or more
B. Four or fewer
2. My normal
teaching responsibilities include (circle all that apply):
A. 1000 and/or 2000 level courses
B. 3000 and/or 4000 level courses
C. Graduate courses
3. In my
opinion, the current U.S.U. standard course evaluation form:
A. Is about as good an instrument as we can
expect to develop
B. Is satisfactory is some respects and
unsatisfactory in others
C. Is unsatisfactory in many respects or all
respects
4. The current
U.S.U. standard course evaluation form differentiates between evaluation of the
instructor and evaluation of the course.
In practice, how useful has this differentiation been to you?
A. Extremely useful
B. Often useful
C. Not very useful
5. If U.S.U.
were to replace in-class hard copy class evaluations with on line evaluations,
it would be necessary to provide the students with an incentive to complete the
evaluations. For example, the
A. It
sounds like a good idea
B. It may be a good idea, but I have reservations
about how incentives would be provided to the students
C. It does not sound like a good idea
6. The Faculty
Evaluation Committee has discussed the possibility of implementing a new form
that would contain a small number questions common to all courses, together
with optional questions that colleges, departments, or individual instructors
could use at their discretion. What you
do you think of this proposal?
A. It sounds like a good idea
B. It may have merit, but I want to see how it
would be implemented
C. It does not sound like a good idea
7. Explain one
to two ways in which you would like to change the course evaluation form. You can refer here to particular questions or
categories of questions you would like to add or eliminate, or offer more
general comments.
8. Do you have
other comments, complaints, or suggestions about the evaluation of teaching at
U.S.U.?
Libraries Advisory Council
Library Advisory Council
FY 04/05 Annual Report
The University Libraries
Advisory Council advises the Vice-Provost for University Libraries and
Instructional Support in (1) meeting the learning, instruction, and research
needs of students, faculty and staff; (2) formulating library policies in
relation to circulation, services, and the collection development of resources
for instruction and research; and (3) interpreting the needs and policies of
the libraries to the University. The Council membership will consist of nine
faculty members, one from each College and Extension with one undergraduate and
graduate student appointed by the Provost. Faculty members will serve
three-year terms and are renewable once. The Vice-Provost for University
Libraries and Instructional Support serves as an ex-officio, non-voting member.
The chair will be elected from the Council membership on an annual basis.
Members:
Byard Wood, Engineering (06)
Ed Stafford, Business (05)
Lisa Berreau, Science (07)
Gary Straquadine, Agriculture (07)
Carl Cheney, Education (05)
Len Rosenband, HASS (06)
Extension – vacant
Ronald Ryel - Natural Resources (06)
A.J. Rounds, ASUSU GSS
Linda Wolcott, ex‑officio
Darin Humphreys, ASUSU
Overview:
The Council met three times during the academic year (Oct. 2004; Feb. and April 2005). Much of the discussion focused the construction of the new library. Steven Harris was introduced as the new collection development and management librarian. Kim Winger was introduced as the public relations and events specialist. The Council was also given updates on: (1) journals review for the 2004/2005 academic year, (2) development activities, including results of the phonathon, furniture naming mailing, and room naming, (3) a summary of new collections/materials received (e.g. van der Pas collection; Jack London materials), and (4) the naming of the new library.
2004/05 Action Items:
1. An ad hoc committee comprised of representatives from the Library Advisory Council, Faculty Senate, Friends of USU Libraries, University Advancement, and the community met to discuss the naming of the new library.
2. Librarians presented a “road show” display at several places on campus to provide information on changes associated with impending move to the new library. This action stemmed from discussion in the Library Advisory Council.
3. A.J. Rounds suggested that ASUSU had funds that they would be willing to donate toward furnishings for the new library. This proposal has since been approved by ASUSU. They will provide $5000 to in part fund the acquisition of a state-of-the-art projection system for the main atrium. This system will be used to announce ASUSU activities, library events, and other information for students.
4. Kent Clark accepted the position as Director of Foundation and Corporate Relations with the University Advancement office and is no longer serving as Library Development Director.
2005/06 Agenda Items:
1. Library dedication
2. Fund-raising and the library's capital campaign
3. Promoting library services and awareness of the new building
4. Ongoing discussion regarding scholarly communications and journal acquisitions
5. Faculty and librarian collaboration and engagement in the curriculum
6. Programming of the Faculty Seminar Room
ASUSU
Honorary Degrees and Commencement Speaker
Honorary
Degrees and Commencement Speaker Letter
Graduate Council
Report to the Faculty Senate
The
2004-2005
The
We have organized this report into three sections. Part one outlines activities and achievements
for 2004-2005. Part two provides general
information about the mission of the
There were several changes in
senior personnel of the
1. Graduate Student Recruitment
Dr. Shelley
Lindauer made major efforts to advance and improve graduate student recruitment
during 2004-2005. For example, Dr.
Lindauer organized visits to a larger number of regional and national graduate
student recruitment events and involved USU faculty and graduate students,
awarded funds to improve unit recruitment efforts to departments, expanded
advertising of USU graduate programs, implemented GRE screenings to identify
and acquire contact information for prospective students and accumulated a
total of over 5500 referrals, ten times more than in any single previous year. New efforts were made to begin tracking
students through the recruitment process to analyze the effectiveness of our
recruitment strategy. The
2.
Graduate Student Funding
The
In addition
to funding to support travel by graduate students presenting at professional
meetings and conferences offered through the Graduate Student Senate, for the
first time the
3. Graduate Council Activities
Although
described in more detail in a later section of this report, the USU Graduate
Council act on new acted on new graduate program proposals and a variety of
graduate issues.
4.
Graduate Application Processing and Student Training
With
the university’s implementation of elements of Banner, it was necessary that
the
The
A. Graduate Council
The Graduate Council reviews and approves the policies
and regulations for graduate studies at
|
|
Representative |
Representing |
Term Expires |
|
|
|
Kenneth L. White |
Agriculture |
2006 |
|
|
|
Glenn McEvoy |
Business |
2005 |
|
|
|
Susan Crowley |
Education |
2006 |
|
|
|
Chuck Swenson |
Engineering |
2005 |
|
|
|
Mark Zachry |
HASS |
2006 |
|
|
|
Todd Crowl |
Natural Resources |
2006 |
|
|
|
Richard Cutter |
Science |
2004 |
|
|
|
Douglas R. Ramsey |
Faculty Senate |
2006 |
|
|
|
John Elsweiler |
Library |
Ex Off |
|
|
|
Thomas Kent |
|
Ex Off |
|
|
|
A. J. Rounds |
Graduate Student Senate
President |
2005 |
|
|
|
Cory Davidson |
Graduate Student Senate
Vice President |
2005 |
|
A
proposal to increase the 12-month base amount for a graduate assistant from the
current maximum of $40,000 to $60,000 (or a maximum total salary at .50
A
proposal to use an “I” grade for ongoing thesis/dissertation research, and a
P/F grade once the thesis or dissertation is completed was approved (
A
proposal to increase the limit on the nonresident tuition waiver for a master’s
degree from 36 credits to 40 credits was approved (
A
proposal to change the application fee structure to $55 for both domestic and
international students (effective
A
proposal from the Department of Computer Science to offer a specialization in
Bioinformatics was approved (
A
proposal from the Department of Sociology, Social Work, and Anthropology to
change the name of the Social Problems specialization to Social Problems and
Inequality, and the Sociology of Development specialization to Social Change
and Development specialization was approved (
A
proposal from the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering to create a
one-member supervisory committee (major professor) for students in the Master
of Engineering program (plan C, coursework only) was approved (
The
following funds were made available for student support through the Graduate
Dean’s office in 2003-2004
|
$180,000 |
Presidential
Fellowships |
|
165,000 |
Research V.P.
Fellowships |
|
96,000 |
University Fellowships |
|
17,137 |
Seely-Hinckley
Scholarships |
|
3,805,799 |
Out-of-State Tuition
Waivers and Doctoral In-state Tuition Remission, and Instate Tuition
Scholarships |
|
$4,263,936 |
Total |
The
Graduate Student Senate (GSS) administers funds from the
Of
the 119 graduate students who applied for travel funds in 2004-2005, 116 were
approved and traveled, with a total expenditure of $34,800. There were 11 fewer awards than in 2002-2003.
Applications
for graduate study at USU during 2004-2005 is difficult to determine exactly
because of the recent conversion to Banner reporting systems. Some applicant information was compiled in
SIS prior to Banner application processing.
However, we will report the data as it currently exists. The total number of Fall 2005 applications
when SIS and Banner data are combined was approximately 2700. We do not have data for spring 2005 or summer
2005 which would increase the total for the year above 2700. Total applications for 2003-2004 was
2994. Another way to assess total
applications is the application revenue during the course of the year. According to this figure, total 2004-2005
applications was about 1% greater than 2003-2004. Table 2 gives a history of application
numbers for recent years.
Total
matriculated graduate student enrollment for Fall 2004 was 2,584, 12.7% of all
The
number of master’s students for 2004-05 decreased by 1% from 2014 to 1993
students (Table 4). There was an
increase of 52 doctoral students to a total of 591 in Fall 2004; a 9.7%
increase from Fall 2003 and a new record high.
Numbers
of degree types and their department distribution is unavailable at present
because of database accessibility.
However, 370 masters and 34 doctoral students attended December
commencement. 456 Masters and 30
doctoral students attended spring 2005 commencement.
American
ethnic minority students continue to be a relatively small percentage of USU’s
matriculated graduate students. The
total for the principle minority groups decreased about 4% in 2004-05 (Table
5).
|
TABLE 1 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Scholarship In-State
Tuition Waivers |
||
|
2004-05 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
College |
Resident Semesters |
Nonresident Semesters |
|
|
|
|
|
Agriculture |
6 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Business |
10 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Education |
12 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering |
9 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Family Life |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
HASS |
9 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Resources |
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Science |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
30 |
TABLE 2
Graduate Applications
for Admission
to Graduate Study
1989-90 to 2003-04
|
Requested
Year of Study |
Number |
|
1989-90 |
(NA, computer failure) |
|
1990-91 |
2469 |
|
1991-92 |
2667 |
|
1992-93 |
3162 |
|
1993-94 |
2933 |
|
1994-95 |
3203 |
|
1995-96 |
2997 |
|
1996-97 |
3085 |
|
1997-98 |
2586 |
|
1998-99 |
2360 |
|
1999-2000 |
2825 |
|
2000-01 |
3039 |
|
2001-02 |
3183 |
|
2002-03 |
3316 |
|
2003-04 |
2994 |
|
2004-05 |
See text |
TABLE 3 |
||||||||||||||
|
USU FALL QUARTER/SEMESTER ENROLLMENTS,a
1994-2004 |
||||||||||||||
|
Total |
|
Undergraduates |
|
Graduate
Studentsb |
|
Matriculated
Graduate Students |
||||||||
|
Year |
N |
% Change |
|
N |
Total |
Change |
|
N |
% Total |
% Change |
|
N |
% Total |
% Change |
|
1994 |
20,371 |
10.7 |
|
16,032 |
78.7% |
7.5 |
|
4,339 |
21.3% |
24.5 |
|
2,261 |
11.1% |
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1995 |
19,861 |
-2.5 |
|
16,197 |
79.5% |
1.0 |
|
3,664 |
18.0% |
-15.6 |
|
2,289 |
11.2% |
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1996 |
20,808 |
4.8 |
|
16,703 |
82.0% |
3.1 |
|
4,105 |
20.2% |
12.0 |
|
2,321 |
11.4% |
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1997 |
21,234 |
2.0 |
|
17,472 |
85.8% |
4.6 |
|
3,762 |
18.5% |
-8.4 |
|
2,517 |
12.4% |
8.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1998 |
19,322 |
-9.0 |
|
16,507 |
81.0% |
-5.5 |
|
2,815 |
13.8% |
-25.2 |
|
2,085 |
10.2% |
-17.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1999 |
20,865 |
8.0 |
|
17,228 |
84.6% |
4.4 |
|
3,637 |
17.9% |
29.2 |
|
2,282 |
11.2% |
9.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000 |
21,490 |
3.0 |
|
17,903 |
87.9% |
3.9 |
|
3,587 |
17.6% |
-1.4 |
|
2,210 |
10.8% |
-3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
23,001 |
7.0 |
|
19,295 |
94.7% |
7.8 |
|
3,706 |
18.2% |
3.3 |
|
2,443 |
12.0% |
10.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
22,848 |
-0.7 |
|
19,736 |
96.9% |
2.3 |
|
3,112 |
15.3% |
-16.0 |
|
2,446 |
12.0% |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
23,474 |
2.7 |
|
19,782 |
97.1% |
0.2 |
|
3,692 |
18.1% |
18.6 |
|
2,553 |
12.5% |
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
23,908 |
1.8 |
|
19,994 |
98.1% |
1.1 |
|
3,914 |
19.2% |
6.0 |
|
2,584 |
12.7% |
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aTotal students,
budget-related and self-supported. |
||||||||||||||
|
bMatriculated and
postbaccalaureate, nonmatriculated students. |
||||||||||||||
|
Source:
1994-2001, Analysis, Accreditation, & Assessment, USU Fact Books;
2002 & 2003 Enrollment Summary Report |
||||||||||||||
|
TABLE 4 |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USU FALL
QUARTER/SEMESTER MATRICULATED |
||||||||||
|
GRADUATE STUDENT
ENROLLMENT, BY LEVEL, 1994-2004 |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
Master's |
|
Doctorate |
|
Total |
|||||
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% Change |
||
|
|
N |
N |
% |
|
N |
N |
% |
|
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
1,771 |
54 |
3.1 |
|
490 |
13 |
2.7 |
|
2,261 |
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1995 |
1,791 |
20 |
1.1 |
|
498 |
8 |
1.6 |
|
2,289 |
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1996 |
1,862 |
71 |
4.0 |
|
459 |
-39 |
-7.8 |
|
2,321 |
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1997 |
2,120 |
258 |
13.9 |
|
397 |
-62 |
-13.5 |
|
2,517 |
8.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1998 |
1,716 |
-404 |
-19.1 |
|
369 |
-28 |
-7.1 |
|
2,085 |
-17.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1999 |
1,914 |
198 |
11.5 |
|
368 |
-1 |
-0.3 |
|
2,282 |
9.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000 |
1,812 |
-102 |
-5.3 |
|
398 |
30 |
8.2 |
|
2,210 |
-3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
2,037 |
225 |
12.4 |
|
406 |
8 |
2.0 |
|
2,443 |
10.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
1,956 |
-81 |
-4.0 |
|
490 |
84 |
20.7 |
|
2,446 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
2,014 |
58 |
3.0 |
|
539 |
49 |
10.0 |
|
2,553 |
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
1,993 |
-21 |
-1.0 |
|
591 |
52 |
9.6 |
|
2,584 |
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994-2004 |
|
243 |
13.7 |
|
|
526 |
10.0 |
|
292 |
12.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source:
1994-2001, Analysis, Accreditation, & Assessment, USU Fact Books;
2002-2004 Enrollment Summary Report |
||||||||||
|
TABLE 5 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Matriculated Ethnic Minority Graduate Student
Enrollments |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
by Degree Level, Fall Quarter 1993-2004a |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Master's |
|
|
Doctorate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Year |
|
Am |
Asian |
Black |
Hisp |
Total |
%a |
|
Am |
Asian |
Black |
Hisp |
Total |
%a |
|
Am |
Asian |
Black |
Hisp |
Total |
%a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1993 |
|
3 |
30 |
4 |
18 |
55 |
3.2 |
|
5 |
13 |
2 |
11 |
31 |
6.5 |
|
8 |
43 |
6 |
29 |
86 |
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
|
4 |
26 |
7 |
19 |
56 |
3.2 |
|
7 |
9 |
1 |
11 |
28 |
5.7 |
|
11 |
35 |
8 |
30 |
84 |
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1995 |
|
7 |
25 |
5 |
13 |
50 |
2.8 |
|
5 |
12 |
3 |
8 |
28 |
5.6 |
|
12 |
37 |
8 |
21 |
78 |
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1996 |
|
9 |
27 |
6 |
17 |
59 |
3.2 |
|
5 |
9 |
3 |
8 |
25 |
5.4 |
|
14 |
36 |
9 |
25 |
84 |
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1997 |
|
14 |
24 |
7 |
28 |
73 |
3.4 |
|
7 |
7 |
3 |
8 |
25 |
6.3 |
|
21 |
31 |
10 |
36 |
98 |
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1998 |
|
7 |
19 |
7 |
16 |
49 |
2.9 |
|
6 |
5 |
1 |
6 |
18 |
4.9 |
|
13 |
24 |
8 |
22 |
67 |
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1999 |
|
5 |
21 |
6 |
13 |
45 |
2.4 |
|
7 |
3 |
4 |
9 |
23 |
6.3 |
|
12 |
24 |
10 |
22 |
68 |
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000 |
|
6 |
19 |
14 |
16 |
55 |
3.0 |
|
7 |
5 |
3 |
9 |
24 |
6.0 |
|
13 |
24 |
7 |
25 |
79 |
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
|
11 |
26 |
6 |
24 |
67 |
3.3 |
|
6 |
6 |
2 |
8 |
22 |
5.4 |
|
17 |
32 |
8 |
46 |
89 |
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
5 |
16 |
9 |
18 |
48 |
2.5 |
|
5 |
7 |
3 |
9 |
24 |
4.9 |
|
10 |
23 |
12 |
27 |
72 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
8 |
21 |
5 |
20 |
54 |
2.7 |
|
4 |
8 |
3 |
8 |
23 |
4.3 |
|
12 |
29 |
8 |
28 |
77 |
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
4 |
19 |
5 |
19 |
47 |
2.4 |
|
5 |
8 |
3 |
10 |
26 |
4.4 |
|
9 |
27 |
8 |
29 |
73 |
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a Percent of all master’s,
doctoral, matriculated graduate students. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source:
Office of Planning and Analysis, USU Fact Books, Enrollment Summary
2004. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||