| Actvity | Method | Participants | Information Collected | Frequency | Use |
| In-house review | Discussion at curriculum meetings and annual retreat | Faculty | Views on strengths and weaknesses of curriculum; appropriateness of materials | On-going | Assess effectiveness and coherence of curriculum |
| Outside evaluation | CEA accreditation reviews; UCIEP membership reviews | Students and faculty | Strengths and weaknesses of curriculum | Accreditation reviews are every 5 years; updates annually | To make necessary curricular changes |
| Self-evaluation of teaching | Teaching portfolios; video; self-assessment; peer review of teaching | Faculty | Peer and self-assessment of individual teaching | At least once a year for tenure-track faculty | Improvement of teaching |
| Student evaluation of teaching | USU teaching evaluation form | All students; every teacher in every class | Student perception of quality of class and instruction | At the end of each term | Teaching improvement; curricular change |
| Faculty performance appraisal | USU annual faculty performance review procedure | All faculty | Student evaluation of instruction; faculty self-evaluation of teaching | Performance evaluation annually; student evaluation of teaching at the end of each term | Teaching improvement |