POLITICAL SCIENCE 4130: AMERICAN
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW II
Spring
2001
M,W,F 3:30-4:20.
Main 326
James
R. Harrigan
Office: Old Main, Room 330E. Office Hours: M,W,F
1:30-3:30, and by appointment.
Phone: 797-1339 email: j_r_harrigan@yahoo.com
Course Objectives:
This course, the second
of a two-part sequence, examines Individual Rights in light of the American
Constitutional regime. We will be
examining the Bill of Rights and subsequent Amendments to the United States
Constitution in great detail, with particular emphasis on case law concerning
freedom of religion, freedom of the press, freedom of speech, gender and racial
issues, and criminal law.
The course will treat all
of the subjects listed above in as much detail as possible. By the end of the
semester you should have a basic understanding of the Court’s treatment of
individual liberties under our Constitution.
No prior understanding of law or of the Constitution is assumed, and you
should expect to cover a significant amount of material in a short period of
time.
This course will
be conducted in Socratic fashion. I
expect students to actively participate in class discussion. The
attendance and participation component of your grade will be determined largely
by how much you choose to participate.
If you choose not to participate, you can expect to receive no
credit. It will be virtually impossible
to get an A in this class without strong participation.
Required Texts:
Ralph A.
Rossum and G. Alan Tarr. American
Constitutional Law. Fifth Edition. Volume II. New
York: St Martin's Press, 1999,
(hereafter ACL).
Alexander
Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. The
Federalist Papers. Ed. Clinton Rossiter.
New York: New American Library,
1999.
Eugene W.
Hickok, Jr., ed. The Bill of Rights:
Original Meaning and Current Understanding.
Charlottesville: University Press of
Virginia, 1991.
Grade Distribution:
First Paper 25%
Second Paper 25%
Final Exam 40%
Class Participation 5%
Case Brief 5%
Because this
is a pre-law course, and writing is an essential ingredient in a successful
career in
the law, you
will be expected to demonstrate competence in the course material in papers
rather than
on typical
examinations. I urge you to take the
assignments seriously. I fully expect
your papers to
be
grammatically perfect . If it takes me
longer to address your spelling and grammar errors than it
takes me to
address the quality of your argument, you will not receive a passing
grade. Each of
your first two
papers will be 5-7 pages in length, and will be a response to a question I give
you in
class. You will have at least one week to complete
these assignments, and the date on which you
will receive
the questions will not be announced.
Attendance is thus doubly important.
Your final
examination will also be a writing assignment.
You will be given a question at roughly
the 2/3 point
in the course, sometime immediately following spring break. Your answer to this
question
should be quite good given the amount of
time that you have to complete it.
Furthermore,
I will be
happy to read rough drafts until two weeks before the due date of your
exam. There is no
excuse for
poor performance.
The case brief
is both a written and oral presentation.
You will be required to present at least one
case during
the course of the semester. It is your
responsibility to see to it that you satisfy this
requirement. A sample case brief can be found on pages
43-44 in the Rossum and Tarr text (please
don’t even try
to pick Texas v. Johnson for your
case).
Class
attendance and participation is simply expected. If you choose to skip classes, you will not
Receive the
participation credit. If you skip
habitually, you can expect to lose more than 5%. Poor
attendance can
(and will) result in a failing grade.
I.
Introduction.
No Readings.
II.
Constitutional
Interpretation and Adjudication.
ACL Vol. II, Chs. 1-2.
III.
Freedom of Speech,
Press, and Association.
Readings: J. S. Mill, On Liberty, Chapter II, “Of the Liberty of Thought and Discussion.” (handout). Hickok: Chs. 7-8, ACL Volume II, Ch. 5. The Bill of Rights, Federalist Nos. 38, 84.
Cases: Gitlow v. New York, Schenck v. United States, Dennis v. United States,
Barenblatt v. United States, Brandenburg v. Ohio, Buckley v. Valeo, Texas v.
Johnson, R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, New York Times v. United States, Branzburg
v. Hayes, New York Times v. Sullivan, Miller v. California, Paris Adult Theater
I v. Slaton, Reno v. ACLU. Hill v. Colorado (handout).
IV.
Freedom of
Religion: Establishment and Free Exercise.
Readings: Hickok: Chs. 4-6, ACL Vol. II, Ch. 6, Thomas Jefferson, Letter to the Danbury Baptist Association, 1802 (handout).
Cases: Everson v. Board of Education, School District of Abington Township v.
Schempp, Lemon v. Kurtzman, Wallace v. Jaffree, Board of Education of Kiryas
Joel Village School District v. Grumet, Rosenberger v. University of Virginia,
West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, Sherbert v. Verner, Lyng v.
Northwest Indian Cemetery Production Association, Employment Division,
Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, City of Boerne v. Flores,
Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. Hialeah (handout), Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe (handout).
V.
Equal Protection
and Racial Discrimination.
Readings: ACL Vol. II, Ch. 8, Federalist No. 54.
Cases: Plessy v. Ferguson, Brown v. Board of Education I & II, Bolling v. Sharpe, Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenberg Board of Education, Milliken v. Bradley, Missouri v. Jenkins I (handout) & II, Shelley v. Kraemer, Moose Lodge No. 107 v. Irvis, Palmore v. Sidoti, Wards Cove Packing v. Antonio, The Civil Rights Act of 1991.
VI.
Equal Protection
and Affirmative Action.
Readings: Ralph Rossum, “Plessy, Brown, and the Reverse Discrimination Cases,” (handout), ACL Vol. II, Ch. 9, Dinesh D’Souza, “Beyond Affirmative Action,” (handout), Wink Twyman, “A Critique of the California Civil Rights Initiative” (handout).
Cases: Bakke v. Regents of the University of California, , Regents of the
University of California v. Bakke, Richmond v. Croson Company, Adarand
Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, Rostker v. Goldberg, United States v. Virginia.
VII.
Voting and
Representation.
Readings: ACL Vol. 2, Ch. 10.
Cases: Wesberry v. Sanders, Reynolds v. Sims, Thornburg v. Gingles, Shaw v.
Reno.
VIII.
The Right to
Privacy: Abortion, Sexual Orientation, and the Right to Die.
Readings: ACL Volume II, Ch. 11, Andrew Sullivan, from “Virtually Normal,” (handout), James Q. Wilson, from “Against Homosexual Marriage,” (handout).
Cases: Griswold v. Connecticut, Roe v. Wade, Planned Parenthood of
Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, Bowers v. Hardwick, Romer v. Evans, Cruzan
v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, Washington v. Glucksberg, Vacco v.
Quill, Boy Scouts of America v. Dale (handout),
Stenberg v. Carhart (handout).
IX.
Criminal Procedure.
Readings: ACL Volume II, Ch. 7, Hickok: Chs. 11, 13, 14, 19-22.
Cases: Olmstead v. United States, Katz v. United States, Gideon v. Wainwright, Miranda v. Arizona, Nix v. Williams, Gregg v. Georgia, Harmelin v. Michigan.