Skip to main content

USU Ecologists Propose New Method to Probe Population Growth Questions

Tuesday, Jul. 26, 2016

USU ecologists David Koons and David Iles

USU ecologists David Koons, left, and David Iles and colleagues describe a new approach for determining how varied life cycle 'contributions' drive population growth and evolutionary fitness in the July 11, 2016, issue of 'Ecology Letters.'

a moose and her calf in Rockey Mountain National Park

Moose and her calf in Colorado's Rocky Mountain National Park. USU ecologists and colleagues report development of a new series of mathematical equations aimed at explaining why some organisms flourish; some decline. Courtesy U.S. Dept. of Interior.

By developing an innovative series of mathematical equations, Utah State University ecologists are shedding light on a stalemate that’s vexed population biologists’ understanding of why some organisms adapt and flourish, while others decline.

“The diversity of life on Earth captivates us,” says David Koons, associate professor in USU’s Department of Wildland Resources and the USU Ecology Center. “Just as species have evolved an array of interesting physical and behavioral characteristics, so have they evolved a diversity of life histories, including patterns of birth, growth, reproduction and survival rates, to multiply.”

With USU doctoral student and Quinney Fellow David Iles, Michael Schaub of the Swiss Ornithological Institute and Hal Caswell of The Netherlands’ University of Amsterdam, Koons devised a way to distill “contributions” from each part of a species’ life cycle to illuminate which parts; that is, rate of sexual development, fecundity, survival probabilities, that drive population growth and evolutionary fitness. The scientists discuss their research in the July 11, 2016, online issue of Ecology Letters.

“A major aim of ecology and evolution is striving to understand which parts of the life cycle drive population growth,” Koons says. “But current understanding of how each part contributes is largely based on limiting assumptions of either constant environments or environmental variation around a constant average.”

These conditions, he says, do not aptly describe our current world, where “average conditions” are shifting because of climate change and human alterations to land and waterways.

“Despite being one of the most mature disciplines in biology, population biology has reached an impasse in trying to close the gap between methodological assumptions and observed reality,” Koons says. “Paraphrasing Mark Twain, this means a great deal of ‘what we think we know just ain’t so.’”

The team’s efforts don’t provide pat conclusions to pressing questions, he cautions, but offer a new approach that can be applied to existing data to help provide more robust answers to a wide range of demographic questions in ecology and evolution.

Related links:

- “USU Grad Student Eyes Arctic Species’ Response to Warming Temps,” Utah State Today

- “USU Quinney Fellow’s Arctic Research Featured in Nat’l Geographic News,” Utah State Today

- “Goose Bumps: Water Fowl Aiding Polar Bear Survival say USU Ecologists,” Utah State Today

- USU Department of Wildland Resources

- USU Ecology Center

- USU Quinney College of Natural Resources

Contact: David Koons, 435-797-8670,

Writer: Mary-Ann Muffoletto, 435-797-3517,

Post your Comment

We welcome your response. Your comment or question will be forwarded to the appropriate person. Please be sure to provide a valid email address so we can contact you, if needed. Your submission will NOT be published online. Thank you.

More News

All news


Utah State Today is available as a weekly e-mail update, with links to news, features, and events. Subscribers stay connected, whether on campus or off.

To receive Utah State Today every week, simply enter your e-mail address below.

Privacy Notice

Unsubscribe here.

Visit our social media hub

Visit our social media hub to see a snapshot of student life and find more USU social media accounts.

Learn more About USU