Out of Style
Title
Out of Style
Paul Butler

194 pages
Published: 2008

ISBN 978-0-87421-679-0
paper $26.95

ISBN 978-0-87421-680-6
e-book $17.95

Add to cart

Paul Butler

Paul Butler is associate professor of English at the University of Houston, where he teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in rhetoric and composition, including composition theory and pedagogy, the craft of writing, research methodologies, and style studies. He is also author of Style in Rhetoric and Composition: a Critical Sourcebook. Previous work has appeared in JAC, Rhetoric Review, WPA: Writing Program Administration, Reflections: Writing, Service-Learning, and Community Literacy, and Authorship in Composition Studies.

Out of Style

Reanimating Stylistic Study in Composition and Rhetoric

Paul Butler

Praise for Out of Style:

Chapter two, "Historical Developments: Relevant Stylistic History and Theory," is an especially important chapter for everyone—yes, everyone—in composition studies to read.

—Rhetoric Review

The way Butler listens to his own sentences here, engaging us in the unfolding of his words and making us sense how time opens up as language is sounded out, brightens our minds, promising us time to languish in the pleasures of style. Butler's opening moves—from recalling himself as a poetry lover, to recounting Richard Ohmann's definition of style as "a way of writing" (qtd. in Butler 2), to raising what he takes to be the canonical questions and positions in the study of style—are also carefully crafted, dynamic, and enveloping. (270)

Butler's genius in the [fifth] chapter lies in his conceptualization of causes: why compositionists do not speak for writing or get heard in public. (272)

Paul Butler's Out of Style does not endorse conventional wisdom. Instead, Butler offers us the more interesting claim that "style is not the product-based residue of current-traditional rhetoric that many say it is [. . .], but rather is a dynamic feature of the very process movement the field considers crucial to its disciplinary identity" (269).

—College English

[Butler] argues that a reanimation of style would not only help form better writing, but would also reanimate invention. And in the process he reinvigorates a history that is dynamic, a Golden Age of Comp. . . . A consciousness of style, of learning about, developing an affinity for, and teaching style will give us a way to counter public arguments against what we do, for we are constantly criticized. . . . This is a call for us to be stylin in public discourse.

—Victor Villanueva
Chair of English, Auburn University
College Composition and Communication 62.4

By reclaiming stylistic study and clearly articulating its value to audiences both within and outside the field, we will not only help writersýwe will also construct our own greater voice in the dialogues and debates in which we are most implicated and invested.

—Tara Lockhart
San Francisco State University
Composition Studies 36.2

By offering a strategic counter reading of our discipline's history, Out of Style undertakes a much needed rehabilitation of style for scholars and teachers in rhetoric and composition. What's especially promising here is Butler's closing argument--namely, that through style, scholars in our field can find a needed entry into public discussions about writing and can influence how our work gets represented in public discourses.

—Frank Farmer
Conger-Gabel Professor of English
University of Kansas

Paul Butler applauds the emerging interest in the study of style among compositionists, arguing that the loss of stylistics from composition in recent decades left it alive only in the popular imagination as a set of grammar conventions. Butler's goal in Out of Style is to articulate style as a vital and productive source of invention, and to redefine its importance for current research, theory, and pedagogy. In so doing, he offers an important revisionist history of the field by reading it specifically through the canon of style.

In addition, Butler argues that it is through style that scholars in the field can find a needed entry into public discussions about writing. Scholars in composition know that the ideas about writing most common in the discourse of public intellectuals are egregiously backward. Without a vital approach to stylistics, Butler argues, writing studies will never dislodge the controlling fantasies of self-authorized pundits in the nation's intellectual press. Composition must answer with a public discourse that is responsive to readers' ongoing interest in style but is also grounded in composition theory.

Preview the Introduction in Acrobat PDF.