Writing assignments are difficult to design. Here are a few
pointers to help make yours top-notch.
One of the most common college-level assignments of all time
goes something like this: "Ten page library research
paper on a topic of your choice, due on the last day of classes."
While most writing assignments are not as vague as this one,
many create more difficulty for students than is necessary.
A bit of care taken with the design of the assignment sheet
can produce better papers that are easier to read and easier
to grade.
DEFINE THE TASK CAREFULLY
When planning a writing assignment, first ask yourself how
the assignment will integrate with the rest of the course.
What do you want students to learn? How does the assignment
serve the objectives of the course? Is it designed to demonstrate
content mastery, to teach disciplinary practices and procedures,
or both? A writing assignment can be a learning tool as well
as an evaluation method.
It is also important to think carefully about exactly what
you want them to do, and make sure that the language of your
assignment clearly and unambiguously defines that task. Look
carefully at the words, and ask yourself if there is anything
in the assignment that would allow students to avoid the task
and do something else. Vague or contradictory words often
lead to inappropriate responses.
MAKE THE PROCESS EXPLICIT
The process or steps necessary to complete the writing assignment
may need to be made explicit. Researchers have found that
students use the assignment sheet as a recipe, keeping it
in front of them as they compose. They see the assignment
sheet as explicit, step-by-step instructions for completing
the task and interpret it very literally. Are the steps of
the assignment clearly presented? Is the order of the activities
a workable one?
DEFINE THE WRITER'S ROLE
The role the writer is to play in the situation is often
a crucial part of the assignment. Without clear guidance,
students often take up either a "text-processing"
role, in which they synthesize material from different sources
without responding to it, or the role of the "street-corner
debater," who argues propositions from his or her own
personal experience and judgement, without sources or professional
vocabulary. The most appropriate role is often that of a "professional-in-training"
who utilizes the perspective and conceptual tools of the discipline.
DEFINE THE AUDIENCE
Related to the question of the writer's role in the situation
is the question of audience--for whom are they writing? Students
often write for the instructor, but they feel that the instructor
already knows all the material anyway, so they have trouble
deciding what to leave in and what to leave out. Defining
a hypothetical audience for the writing, and helping students
understand the expectations of that audience, will help students
make these decisions.
USE A REAL-WORLD MODEL
Many of the problems mentioned above can be solved if the
writing task is modeled on a professional, real-world task.
Research papers and other common academic assignments often
have no real audience other than the instructor, and no purpose
other than demonstrating that certain material has been covered.
Reports, memos, articles, and instructions have real or potentially
real audiences and purposes, and thus are easier to teach
and easier to write.
Another solution is to provide a model or sample of what
the finished product should look like. Even a quick glance
at a representative sample can clear up a lot of confusion.
PROVIDE EVALUATION CRITERIA
Finally, think about how you are going to evaluate the finished
product. What are your criteria? Will your criteria allow
you to make clear distinctions when assigning grades? Will
your students understand your decisions? Students need to
know how much emphasis you will place on such things as focus,
organization, format, grammar, punctuation, critical thinking,
logic, evidence, and use of sources.
FURTHER READING
Helping Students Write Well: A Guide for Teachers in All
Disciplines, by Barbara Walvoord Thinking and Writing in College:
A Naturalistic Study of Students in Four Disciplines, by Barbara
Walvoord and Lucille McCarthy.
"Specify: PURPOSE, AUDIENCE, METHODS OF DEVELOPMENT,
FORMAT, EVALUATION STANDARDS." -- John R. Edlund, Cal
State, LA, 1993
|